[Your Name]AI Systems
Back to projects

LLM Automation / Knowledge Retrieval

RAG Customer Support System

A support assistant concept that retrieves internal knowledge, drafts grounded answers, and keeps escalation visible for human agents.

Project statusCase Study
Next.jsFastAPILangChainQdrantPostgreSQLOpenAI API

Overview

This project frames a production-ready RAG workflow for customer support: ingest documents, chunk and embed content, retrieve relevant context, generate a draft answer, and expose citations for human review.

Problem

Support knowledge changes frequently and usually lives across different sources. A plain chatbot can hallucinate, while manual search slows down response time.

Goal

Build a grounded assistant that helps agents answer faster while preserving traceability, confidence, and escalation paths.

Architecture

  • Document ingestion worker for PDFs, markdown, and internal knowledge pages.
  • Embedding pipeline with metadata for source, product area, version, and access level.
  • FastAPI service for retrieval, answer generation, feedback capture, and audit logs.
  • Next.js dashboard for asking questions, reviewing citations, and flagging weak answers.

System Flow

Input

Admin uploads or syncs knowledge documents.

Process

Worker extracts text, chunks content, generates embeddings, and stores metadata.

AI Layer

Agent asks a question from the dashboard.

Storage/API

API retrieves relevant chunks, sends grounded context to the LLM, and returns answer plus citations.

Review

Agent accepts, edits, escalates, or flags the answer.

Tech Stack

Next.jsFastAPILangChainQdrantPostgreSQLOpenAI API

Key Features

  • Citation-first answer layout.
  • Knowledge source filters by product area and document type.
  • Human feedback capture for incorrect, stale, or incomplete answers.
  • Fallback path when retrieval confidence is low.

AI / ML Component

  • Chunking and embedding strategy for searchable support knowledge.
  • Vector search with metadata filtering.
  • LLM prompt layer that separates retrieved facts from generated response.
  • Evaluation set placeholder for answer quality and citation relevance.

Data Flow

  1. 1Admin uploads or syncs knowledge documents.
  2. 2Worker extracts text, chunks content, generates embeddings, and stores metadata.
  3. 3Agent asks a question from the dashboard.
  4. 4API retrieves relevant chunks, sends grounded context to the LLM, and returns answer plus citations.
  5. 5Agent accepts, edits, escalates, or flags the answer.

Challenges

  • Keeping generated answers grounded in retrieved content.
  • Handling stale knowledge and conflicting document versions.
  • Designing a useful confidence and escalation experience.

Solution / Trade-off

  • Prioritize cited draft answers over fully automated replies for the MVP.
  • Use metadata filtering before prompt complexity to reduce irrelevant context.
  • Keep evaluation samples editable so domain experts can improve quality over time.

Result

Result metrics are not filled yet. Add real response-time, adoption, and answer-quality data after deployment or user testing.

Screenshot / Demo Placeholder

/images/rag-support-placeholder.png

Replace this area with real screenshots, dashboard captures, architecture diagrams, or a short demo video once the asset is ready.

GitHub / Live Link Placeholder

What I Would Improve

  • Add offline evaluation reports for retrieval quality.
  • Add role-based knowledge access.
  • Add conversation analytics for unresolved topics.