LLM Automation / Knowledge Retrieval
RAG Customer Support System
A support assistant concept that retrieves internal knowledge, drafts grounded answers, and keeps escalation visible for human agents.
Overview
This project frames a production-ready RAG workflow for customer support: ingest documents, chunk and embed content, retrieve relevant context, generate a draft answer, and expose citations for human review.
Problem
Support knowledge changes frequently and usually lives across different sources. A plain chatbot can hallucinate, while manual search slows down response time.
Goal
Build a grounded assistant that helps agents answer faster while preserving traceability, confidence, and escalation paths.
Architecture
- Document ingestion worker for PDFs, markdown, and internal knowledge pages.
- Embedding pipeline with metadata for source, product area, version, and access level.
- FastAPI service for retrieval, answer generation, feedback capture, and audit logs.
- Next.js dashboard for asking questions, reviewing citations, and flagging weak answers.
System Flow
Input
Admin uploads or syncs knowledge documents.
Process
Worker extracts text, chunks content, generates embeddings, and stores metadata.
AI Layer
Agent asks a question from the dashboard.
Storage/API
API retrieves relevant chunks, sends grounded context to the LLM, and returns answer plus citations.
Review
Agent accepts, edits, escalates, or flags the answer.
Tech Stack
Key Features
- Citation-first answer layout.
- Knowledge source filters by product area and document type.
- Human feedback capture for incorrect, stale, or incomplete answers.
- Fallback path when retrieval confidence is low.
AI / ML Component
- Chunking and embedding strategy for searchable support knowledge.
- Vector search with metadata filtering.
- LLM prompt layer that separates retrieved facts from generated response.
- Evaluation set placeholder for answer quality and citation relevance.
Data Flow
- 1Admin uploads or syncs knowledge documents.
- 2Worker extracts text, chunks content, generates embeddings, and stores metadata.
- 3Agent asks a question from the dashboard.
- 4API retrieves relevant chunks, sends grounded context to the LLM, and returns answer plus citations.
- 5Agent accepts, edits, escalates, or flags the answer.
Challenges
- Keeping generated answers grounded in retrieved content.
- Handling stale knowledge and conflicting document versions.
- Designing a useful confidence and escalation experience.
Solution / Trade-off
- Prioritize cited draft answers over fully automated replies for the MVP.
- Use metadata filtering before prompt complexity to reduce irrelevant context.
- Keep evaluation samples editable so domain experts can improve quality over time.
Result
Result metrics are not filled yet. Add real response-time, adoption, and answer-quality data after deployment or user testing.
Screenshot / Demo Placeholder
/images/rag-support-placeholder.png
Replace this area with real screenshots, dashboard captures, architecture diagrams, or a short demo video once the asset is ready.
GitHub / Live Link Placeholder
What I Would Improve
- Add offline evaluation reports for retrieval quality.
- Add role-based knowledge access.
- Add conversation analytics for unresolved topics.