LLM Workflow / Recruiting Automation
AI Screening CV
A CV screening workflow that parses resumes, maps evidence to job criteria, and produces review-friendly candidate summaries.
Overview
AI Screening CV helps reviewers compare candidates against a role-specific rubric while keeping the evidence visible and editable.
Problem
Resume screening can become inconsistent when reviewers rely on quick keyword matching or opaque AI scores.
Goal
Create a transparent assistant that extracts relevant experience, maps it to criteria, and supports human hiring decisions.
Architecture
- Resume upload and parsing service.
- Role criteria configuration with must-have and nice-to-have signals.
- LLM extraction layer that returns structured evidence, not final hiring decisions.
- Reviewer dashboard for notes, status, and shortlist decisions.
System Flow
Input
Recruiter defines role criteria.
Process
Candidate CV is uploaded and parsed.
AI Layer
AI extracts experience, skills, and supporting evidence.
Storage/API
Dashboard shows criteria mapping and review notes.
Review
Human reviewer decides next step.
Tech Stack
Key Features
- Candidate evidence mapped to job criteria.
- Reviewer notes and status pipeline.
- Missing evidence warnings.
- Prompt and rubric placeholders for role-specific tuning.
AI / ML Component
- Resume text extraction and section classification.
- LLM-based structured extraction with schema validation.
- Embedding search for matching experience to role criteria.
- Bias and compliance reminder placeholders for human review.
Data Flow
- 1Recruiter defines role criteria.
- 2Candidate CV is uploaded and parsed.
- 3AI extracts experience, skills, and supporting evidence.
- 4Dashboard shows criteria mapping and review notes.
- 5Human reviewer decides next step.
Challenges
- Avoiding opaque scoring and unfair automation.
- Handling diverse resume formats.
- Separating evidence extraction from hiring decisions.
Solution / Trade-off
- Use AI as a review assistant, not an automated gatekeeper.
- Expose evidence snippets so reviewers can challenge the output.
- Keep score labels configurable or optional.
Result
Result metrics are intentionally left as placeholders. Add real screening throughput and reviewer feedback after pilot usage.
Screenshot / Demo Placeholder
/images/cv-screening-placeholder.png
Replace this area with real screenshots, dashboard captures, architecture diagrams, or a short demo video once the asset is ready.
GitHub / Live Link Placeholder
What I Would Improve
- Add anonymized review mode.
- Add rubric versioning.
- Add export to applicant tracking systems.